In discussions of homosexuality and the Bible, sexual revisionists sometimes claim that Jesus said nothing about homosexuality, and consequently that it must not have been an important issue to him. (We’ll call this the Argument from Silence on Homosexual Behavior – or just “The Argument from Silence” for short.) Why, then, do Christians who affirm the historic Christian teachings regarding human sexuality oppose homosexuality? Continue reading
“Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.” – Jeremiah 10:2-4
I’ve encountered this passage twice, both times in the context of people trying to establish that Christmas is a pagan holiday. Does this passage prohibit Christmas trees? Continue reading
I read your announcement regarding your stomach cancer diagnosis with great sadness for you, your family, and the Church. You have done much to edify your fellow believers and to spread the gospel and, beyond that, the love of Jesus and of others that is evident in your life has endeared you to many of us. We love you and are praying for you, your family, and your ministry.
When Christians avoid principled conflict on things that matter because of fear of disunity and division, they cripple the church in three ways. First, Scripture commands that we guard the truth within our ranks; where arguments are few, error abounds. Second, believers are denied the opportunity to learn how to argue among themselves in a fair, reasonable, and gracious way. Third, the outcome for fight-phobic churches is not genuine oneness, but a contrived unanimity, a shallow and artificial peace.
– Greg Koukl
In some Christian circles, public disagreement, debate, and correction are seen as anathema. These Christians believe that we introduce division by allowing disagreements and public correction, and that we weaken our testimony to non-Christians. Others believe that public correction or dispute is unbiblical. Why? Continue reading
Like many people, when I first heard that Donald Trump was running for president, I thought it was a joke. Months later, however, the sad possibility that Trump may be the next Republican nominee for POTUS can’t be denied or laughed at.
It is fairly obvious from my Facebook posts that I am supporting Ted Cruz for President, and that I am starkly opposed to Donald Trump. I haven’t said much about Marco Rubio, and recently a few of my friends asked for my thoughts as to why I picked Ted Cruz over Marco Rubio.
Last evening I had the opportunity to attend an advance screening of the movie God’s Not Dead. Many had asked me for my take on the movie based on trailers, but now that I’ve seen the movie I’d like to offer a few thoughts. But first, for those who have not heard of the movie or seen the trailer, here is a synopsis from the movie website: Continue reading
I recently came across the above flyer posted on bulletin boards all over the campus where I teach. It appears to show how similar the moral teachings of the world religions are. Let’s take a closer look.
As I walked across campus to my first class one October morning at the college where I teach, I was delighted to discover that almost every square inch of sidewalk had been covered in propaganda. It was nice to see that our sidewalk space was not going to waste, especially since the quality of thought and artistry put into the decorations were almost as good as the thought and artistry found in average bumper stickers. At least it aspired to be. In reality, the reasoning was about as compelling as listening to two junior high boys argue over whose fart was smellier. Here are a few of the more entertaining examples:
- “LGBTTQQIA” – Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, ?, Queer, Questioning, Intersexed, Allies. My problem with this one is that it’s just not inclusive enough. Yes, I know the list has grown from just LGBT a few years ago, but really, we can do better people. Where are the pedophiles, for instance? Why are the incestuous, and the bestial, and the Sado-masochists excluded? What about those who enjoy relations with aliens (let’s not forget Katy Perry’s song “E.T.” here, people!)? I propose that next year we include those truly marginalized groups: LGBTTQQIAPIBSMX = Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, ? (still no clue), Queer, Questioning, Intersexed, Allies, Pederasts, Incestuous, Bestial, Sadists, Masochists, and Xenophiles.
- “<3 + <3 [heart + heart]= marriage.” Really? Why not “<3 + <3 + <3 = marriage?” Or what if the two hearts share a relationship by blood, or if one of the hearts is a little young? For that matter, why even limit this to hearts at all? We shouldn’t discriminate against people with artificial hearts, for instance, or even against people with no hearts at all.
- “What God would damn a heart? What God drove us apart?” Ooh, I love brain-teasers, and this one is upping the ante with a two-part question. I should write exams like this! Ok, lemme give part A a shot. What God would damn a heart. … … Ok, so since damning is sending to hell, a place of judgment, I want to say that the answer is “a just God,” because he’s interested in judgment and justice. But… tricky! Since sending to hell requires moral authority, I want to say the answer is “a holy God.” Unless… I got it! It has to be both! A just *and* holy God would damn a heart! Wow, that was tough. I didn’t expect the trick question. Now for the second part. “What God drove us apart?” … … Oh, good, this one is more straightforward. Since we already used “a just and holy God” as the answer for part A, that leaves just one answer for part B. “What God drove us apart?” The god of self.
- “Love is for everyone.” Did someone say differently? Don’t think so. Did someone challenge you on your fatally flawed definition of love? Definitely.
- Rainbows in chalk: The rainbow is the symbol of God’s promise never to destroy the Earth with a flood again, and a timeless symbol of the redemption of God’s people. Why co-opt a Christian symbol? What was wrong with the pink triangle? It brought attention to how homosexuals were persecuted in Nazi Germa… What’s that? Hitler and some of the Nazi leadership may have been homosexual? Errm. Nevermind.
- This next one, as an announcement from the registrar, should have just been placed on their website, but I guess they’re suffering from funding being diverted for all of the LGBTTQQIAPIBSMX activities (and the related healthcare costs): “You can’t major in hate.” It wasn’t clear if this means the entire department is being abolished, or if they are just merging with the LGBTTQQIAPIBSMX department. At any rate, the hate minor is still alive and well, apparently. No word on whether or not the “Reasoned Disagreement” major will ever be approved.
- I’m not sure how to type this one, but picture the male symbol, and picture the female symbol. In marriage, the two symbols are interlocked. In addition to this symbol for marriage, the homosexuals also drew their own combinations, such as two male symbols together, and two female symbols together -which is par for the course around Coming Out Day. What confused me was the strange combination of fused symbols, such that two male symbols were combined with a female symbol all into one, and this one symbol was paired with another similar to it. Does this represent the as-yet-undiscovered sexes? Speaking of sexes, what’s up with this whole “intersexed” and “transgendered” thing? Why is it that sexual orientation is supposedly determined genetically, but actual physical sex can’t be determined genetically? Or finally, why is gender a fluid concept but sexual orientation fixed?
- “Someone loves you.” Can’t argue there. There’s always one “Someone” who loves you. Not coincidentally, it is the same just and holy God that can damn a heart to hell. That’s good news, because that means he can do something about it, if you’re willing to accept his pardon. I guess I’d better go back and change my answer to number 3: “A just, holy, and loving God.”
I once called memes the bumper stickers of the internet, but sometimes they end up trying to be informational graphics that actually try to make a case for the meme creator’s viewpoint. Unfortunately, such argumentative memes rarely demonstrate better reasoning than their bumper sticker counterparts. Here is one such meme I encountered the other day (apologies for my comments in red!): Continue reading